<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 20 Websites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.internetmarker.com/2007/01/28/top-20-websites-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.internetmarker.com/2007/01/28/top-20-websites-2/</link>
	<description>Make Your Mark On The NET</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 06:54:44 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy Kazeniac</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmarker.com/2007/01/28/top-20-websites-2/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Kazeniac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 20:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmarker.com/2007/01/28/top-20-websites-2/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>There is a follow-up to the top 20 site by time spent post on the Compete.com blog.  The post features the Attention 200 - a list of the top 200 sites ranked according to time spent/engagement.  It is interesting to see where everyone falls in after the top 20.  Here is the link... http://blog.compete.com/2007/02/05/compete-attention-200/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a follow-up to the top 20 site by time spent post on the Compete.com blog.  The post features the Attention 200 &#8211; a list of the top 200 sites ranked according to time spent/engagement.  It is interesting to see where everyone falls in after the top 20.  Here is the link&#8230; <a href="http://blog.compete.com/2007/02/05/compete-attention-200/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.compete.com/2007/02/05/compete-attention-200/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
